New York Win 4 · positional

New York Win 4 — positional

Four digits, 0–9, drawn twice daily by the New York Lottery ("Win 4" — Midday + Evening) since July 1981. Outcome space: 10,000 combinations.

24,956 draws1981-07-21 → 2026-10-11midday: 9,043evening: 15,913
Reading this honestly
Each cell shows how often a digit landed in a particular slot. If the draws are fair, every slot should look like 0–9 picked from a hat — about 10% each, with sample noise. Any heat pattern you can see by eye is almost certainly within that noise band.
showing 9,043 draws (midday)
Digit-by-position heatmap

Which digit shows up where

How often each digit 0–9 landed in each position
pos / digit0123456789
P1
942
10.4%
949
10.5%
891
9.9%
904
10.0%
956
10.6%
889
9.8%
858
9.5%
907
10.0%
872
9.6%
875
9.7%
P2
929
10.3%
920
10.2%
922
10.2%
901
10.0%
905
10.0%
933
10.3%
879
9.7%
918
10.2%
848
9.4%
888
9.8%
P3
942
10.4%
872
9.6%
906
10.0%
863
9.5%
874
9.7%
927
10.3%
907
10.0%
931
10.3%
955
10.6%
866
9.6%
P4
951
10.5%
928
10.3%
876
9.7%
899
9.9%
892
9.9%
876
9.7%
908
10.0%
906
10.0%
926
10.2%
881
9.7%
coolerwarmer
Sum distribution

All digits added together (0–36)

Middling sums are commonest simply because more digit combinations produce them.

Draw count for each possible digit sum
01
15
28
315
425
549
672
7119
8168
9204
10271
11331
12348
13433
14533
15542
16599
17596
18620
19603
20579
21485
22468
23456
24360
25305
26225
27196
28151
2997
3065
3152
3230
3314
3412
355
361
Draw shapes

Repeats inside one draw

All distinct4,621 · 51.1%
Has a double4,051 · 44.8%
Has a triple361 · 4.0%
Has a quad10 · 0.1%
Digital root distribution

Sum reduced to a single digit (0–9)

Digital root keeps adding digits until one is left. Reference under uniform digits ≈ 11.1% per class for 1–9, lower for 0.

root = 01 · 0.0%
root = 11,030 · 11.4%
root = 21,015 · 11.2%
root = 3913 · 10.1%
root = 4978 · 10.8%
root = 51,068 · 11.8%
root = 6988 · 10.9%
root = 71,035 · 11.4%
root = 8994 · 11.0%
root = 91,021 · 11.3%
Box-type breakdown

Pick 4 box types

Observed share vs the theoretical share under uniform random digits.

no-match51.1% · expected 50.4%
single-double42.4% · expected 43.2%
double-double2.4% · expected 2.7%
triple4.0% · expected 3.6%
quad0.1% · expected 0.1%