Wisconsin Pick 4 · positional

Wisconsin Pick 4 — positional

Four digits, 0–9, drawn twice daily by the Wisconsin Lottery. Outcome space: 10,000 combinations.

12,964 draws1997-09-15 → 2026-11-10midday: 10,624evening: 2,340
Reading this honestly
Each cell shows how often a digit landed in a particular slot. If the draws are fair, every slot should look like 0–9 picked from a hat — about 10% each, with sample noise. Any heat pattern you can see by eye is almost certainly within that noise band.
showing 12,964 draws (combined)
Digit-by-position heatmap

Which digit shows up where

How often each digit 0–9 landed in each position
pos / digit0123456789
P1
1310
10.1%
1296
10.0%
1272
9.8%
1310
10.1%
1292
10.0%
1312
10.1%
1310
10.1%
1288
9.9%
1260
9.7%
1314
10.1%
P2
1269
9.8%
1323
10.2%
1273
9.8%
1304
10.1%
1327
10.2%
1263
9.7%
1305
10.1%
1302
10.0%
1281
9.9%
1317
10.2%
P3
1261
9.7%
1307
10.1%
1241
9.6%
1377
10.6%
1326
10.2%
1251
9.6%
1291
10.0%
1272
9.8%
1328
10.2%
1310
10.1%
P4
1287
9.9%
1199
9.2%
1287
9.9%
1318
10.2%
1262
9.7%
1353
10.4%
1358
10.5%
1314
10.1%
1312
10.1%
1274
9.8%
coolerwarmer
Sum distribution

All digits added together (0–36)

Middling sums are commonest simply because more digit combinations produce them.

Draw count for each possible digit sum
03
15
214
315
446
567
6119
7141
8251
9284
10354
11410
12518
13581
14728
15754
16835
17902
18837
19895
20798
21753
22706
23654
24520
25484
26324
27298
28206
29183
30105
3187
3248
3316
3416
357
360
Draw shapes

Repeats inside one draw

All distinct6,385 · 49.3%
Has a double6,101 · 47.1%
Has a triple463 · 3.6%
Has a quad15 · 0.1%
Digital root distribution

Sum reduced to a single digit (0–9)

Digital root keeps adding digits until one is left. Reference under uniform digits ≈ 11.1% per class for 1–9, lower for 0.

root = 03 · 0.0%
root = 11,460 · 11.3%
root = 21,405 · 10.8%
root = 31,391 · 10.7%
root = 41,420 · 11.0%
root = 51,497 · 11.5%
root = 61,409 · 10.9%
root = 71,476 · 11.4%
root = 81,484 · 11.4%
root = 91,419 · 10.9%
Box-type breakdown

Pick 4 box types

Observed share vs the theoretical share under uniform random digits.

no-match49.3% · expected 50.4%
single-double44.1% · expected 43.2%
double-double3.0% · expected 2.7%
triple3.6% · expected 3.6%
quad0.1% · expected 0.1%